Limited Problem Domain
Compared to .NET application development by an asp net development company, and considering that .NET is a versatile software framework, the use of NodeJS as a universal framework is questionable. NodeJS has a limited set of use-cases. Compared to the .NET core’s universal appeal, NodeJS often becomes more prototyping or POC framework. For serious, business/mission-critical applications with predictable scalability requirements. .NET application development wins by leap years. When it comes to enterprise security, business-to-business application integration, data analysis, and ingestion, .NET is the preferred framework.
Batteries Included Vs. Get It On Your Own
One of the reasons why an expert asp net development company prefers the .Net framework is because it has lots of inbuilt APIs and libraries for every type of use case. Compared to NodeJS, which only has a limited set of inbuilt API support, .NET application developers do not need to look out of the framework towards third-party plugins or libraries. In contrast, in the NodeJS world, almost every NodeJS project has used a high percentage of APIs/libraries/tools from third-party unverified sources, independent developers. For an enterprise-level project, this is a strict no. Third-party plugins that are sanctioned and vetted by organizations are the ones to use.
In NodeJS, the vetting process is arbitrary and based on hearsay. Dot Net Core application development by an asp net development company uses third-party libraries from reputed sources.
Why .NET Core Is Better Than Node JS?
.NET Core is Optionally Asynchronous Whereas Node JS is Fully Synchronous
One of the main advantages of NodeJS for a software application development company is that writing asynchronous code is an intuitive process. This is because the quality of being asynchronous is what makes NodeJS different. NodeJS APIs are either synchronous or asynchronous. The use of promises and callback functions makes the whole NodeJS paradigm ideal for fast CRUD operations. The non-blocking IO of NodeJS, its event loop, and low-latency fetch-retrieve-respond cycle have their use cases. But .NET core has asynchronous programming too. The asynchronous and await patterns implement this same functionality, albeit as an optional feature. So the question is – when .NET core application development by an asp net development company has asynchronous programming inbuilt, why is there a need to select NodeJS only because of its native support for asynchronous functions?
.NET Core is Container Friendly Where Node JS is Only Being Container Ready
There is a difference between being container-friendly and container-ready. The former state is when a framework is optimized to run the container. The latter state is when a framework provides out-of-the-box support for containers, and not much development has gone into optimizations. Considering that the .NET framework is closely integrated with Microsoft Azure, container friendliness is an inbuilt quality of .NET app development by an asp net development company. The close association with Azure, Kubernetes and several other containerization platforms makes .NET possess more features and functionality to spawn and manage containers effectively. The Microsoft Nano Server is an efficient container OS providing a cost-effective runtime for developers to deploy containers on Windows or Linux.
.NET Core Is Suited For Computation Intensive Backends
.NET core has multithreading which enables parallel programming. Although NodeJS lovers may argue that callback functions create a similar programming effect, it is a well-known fact that NodeJS is not suited for computation-intensive backend programming. NodeJS is suited for fast CRUD operations where there is little or no backend processing. For example, loading videos, photos, tweets, and blog posts are examples of data retrieval. But use cases such as processing banking transactions, flight ticket processing, secure financial payment processing, credit card validations, mathematical computations – all of these require high parallel programming – for which .NET framework is best suited.
Any asp net development company will instead stick with .NET core even for CRUD intensive applications so that their applications are future-proof if there is a need for backend intensive processing. NodeJS is only for one-dimensional applications, where the future of these applications is predictable. Even if a NodeJS application needs to adapt to computation-intensive backends, then extra work is required to cross-integrate the application with other microservices implemented in .NET to fetch the computing services. So .NET is preferred as a wholesome tool for all types of application development.
To handle heavy CRUD load, an asp net development company can skillfully utilize the optional asynchronous programming methodology. Because this feature is natively and intuitively available in NodeJS, programmers implement this technique by default, which might give the illusion that NodeJS performs better on high throughput request-response cycles.
.NET Core Libraries Are Vastly Superior
.NET core inherits the libraries of the veritable .NET framework. That’s like inheriting decades of good work in the form of established libraries that have been optimized for performance. The fact that Microsoft has always committed to keeping library code as close to runtime means any library’s code is ahead-of-time rather than just-in-time. Dot Net Core also has practical tools for an asp net development company to manage code, libraries, and dependencies – whereas in NodeJS, managing dependencies is left to the developer’s discretion. There is no absolute standard technique to do this.
.NET Core Has Support For GUI Development
Get the best software development services from an expert asp net development company. Integrative Systems offers .Net development services for web, mobile, and desktop utilizing cutting-edge tools and technologies. Reach out to Integrative Systems at firstname.lastname@example.org for building new digital assets, application development, technology modernization, up-gradation, and consulting services.